沈默的大多數面對以黎賤英為首的「傳霉、教屍學者、販民政棍」不用感到無奈，基於歷史因素及生果金黑利誘一些無骨風的「文人學士」，爭相加入害港集團成為走狗一員為黎賤英出一份力造假說謊，令到牠們係香港可以打橫黎行每每以「民革」手段摌除異見者。但害港集團多年來倒行逆施，對外賣港真面目被全面拆穿，對內一眾大大小小的真假太監為名為利你爭我奪，黎賤英集團看似仍可以指鹿為馬為所欲為實則早已外強中乾。廣大市民對於本地傳霉、學者、民調等等的「信任評級」早已跌到等同＜大紀元時報＞！
或許大家早已習以為常每年六、七月鬼門關大開，賤霉例必不斷創作故仔自製新聞（不需舉例為牠們賣廣告吧！），企圖非常明顯就是製造民怨，希望希更多無腦刁民上街為牠們抬轎子。沈默的大多數對此「民革」歪風看似無能為力，但不要忘記今年九月份大家就可以用手中票，對收取生果黑金、與害港集團為虎作倀的假仁假義假民主政棍作出有力的打擊！
向一眾出賣香港、毒害下一代的賤媒、政棍說不！
談七一：Anna Tse 《A day for celebration, not protest》及杜葉錫恩《Councillors need to ‘serve the people’》
議會成員須服務人民
杜葉錫恩 觀塘
臨近選舉，我們會讀到來屆立法會議員候選人的選舉承諾，一些出自真心，一些容或假意。
作為前市政局及立法會議員，我兩者都有見過。議員的職稱、及作為政府議會成員所得到的公眾關注，對某些人來說確有相當大的吸引力，但他們所做的事，卻並非常常、甚至經常，與他們的承諾相符。
百年前一位著名穆斯林作家Saiyid Sulayman Nadwi寫的金句，或許能道出現今一些立法會議員的情況：「每個國家的立法機關沒完沒了地制訂及廢除法例，但他們的工作，鮮有為他們聲稱代表的人民的福祉而為。」
這金句會否令我們驟然想起這年代、近日一些故作姿態的立法會議員的行為？但願即將舉行的選舉，能選出對「服務人民」真正講得出做得到的候選人。
當貧富差距拉得太遠，與香港五十至八十年代的情況相若，甚至更差時，市民有需要、亦應得到貨真價實的服務。
A day for celebration, not protest
Anna Tse, Mid-Levels
On July 1we celebrate our reunion with the motherland. But it has become a day of complaints. A vociferous group of malcontents usurps centre stageon the festive occasion to demonstrate their penchant for carping.
Obsessed with fault-finding, they exaggerate the developmental problems which our respectedcentral government and the nascent special administrative region government aim to overcome.
They fail to review their fundamentalist ideals of individual rights in the realistic context of globalisation, where governments act for their citizens in the competition for economic growth and employment opportunities.They disregard our country’s achievements, overlook historical hardships which our countrymen have overcome and ignore our leaders’ struggle in the international arena to improvethe nation’s economic, political and cultural standing.
They idolise the Anglo-American form of liberal democracy, not knowing that such a tradition of idealistic liberalism is predicated on the economic exploitations of historical UShegemony or British imperialism. Without such historical advantage, countries such as those in Europe may only afford social democracy which emphasises collective social responsibilities instead of the misguided belief in the individual’s right to maximise personal interests.
Liberalism is a luxury that cannot exist without a strong economy. As the US economy falters, individual rights inevitably dwindle while the government expands controls.In an article in The New York Times on June 24,former US president Jimmy Carterlamented the US government’s gross human rights violations in recent years, such as “assassinations”, indefinite detention and “warrantless wiretapping” of American citizens and foreigners, and air strikeson civilian homes in foreign countries.But no American would protest against these violations on July 4, the day of their country’s national celebration.
For us, the Tiananmen tragedy is a historical issue and not the only national issue. We must look into allegations about maltreatment of political activists who, however, are not the protagonists of July 1 – a day for jubilant consolidation and not for rowdy rallies to incitedissent.
While an agnostic, I’m prepared to quote from Galatiansand plead that “for at the proper time we shall reap, not desponding; then, as we have opportunity, may we work the good to all”.
Councillors need to ‘serve the people’
Elsie Tu, Kwun Tong
It will soon be election time, and we shall read the promises, true and some maybe untrue, of candidates for the next Legislative Council.
Having been a member of the (former) urban council andLegco, I have seen both kinds. Having the title of councillor,and the publicity given to those who become members of government councils, isa great attraction to some people but their workdoes not always, or even often, match their promises.
This verse written nearly100 years ago by a famous Muslim writer, Saiyid Sulayman Nadwi,may speak to some legislators of today:”Thelegislatures in every country make and unmake laws endlessly, but seldom their labours are for the benefit of the people whom they profess to represent.”
Does this ring a bell concerning the activities of some of the legislators we have seen recently posturing in our time? May we hope that the coming elections will produce
candidates who really mean it when they say they will, “Serve the people”.
The people are in need and deserve genuine service these days, when the gap between the rich and poor has widened too far, a gap similar to, or even worse than that which existed in the 1950s to the 1980s in Hong Kong.
