家書港言:霸王官司締造三贏

法官陸啟康捍衛言論自由

Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 法官陸啟康捍衛言論自由

  1. MK says:

    Judgment should be fair enough to a person/organisation who committed same crime again and again, the judge should not put the convict and the society to measure together; the small fine in this case is a strong signal to anyone who can pay fees to commit crime. Freedom of speech and press freedom need to be protected by anyone, but it should never be a weapon should a people going to harm others irrationally or for self-interest. I hope the Department of Justice will raise an appeal to the too light of purpose judgement. May God help our judges on their works.

    • chkp says:

      法官輕判誹謗罪犯是出於「維護香港『言論自由』『新聞自由』」,其荒謬一如呆灣放生電騙犯是為了促進電子商貿,印度犯生強姦犯是為了保障戀愛自由!

Leave a Reply to chkp Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *